On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
The OP chief Kyrylo Budanov. Photo: Budanov's Telegram channel
The OP chief Kyrylo Budanov, at a meeting with journalists, stated that the UOC cannot be called the "Moscow Patriarchate," and that pressure in the spiritual field is unacceptable. These words might seem like a Captain Obvious-style remark, but in today's Ukraine they had an effect of a bombshell. The video with Budanov was massively reposted on social networks by both supporters of the UOC and its opponents. In the first camp – restrained optimism, in the second – indignation. Moreover, UOC haters are raising quite reasonable questions: if the UOC has no ties to Moscow, then what is the value of the “studies” by the State Ethnopolitics Service, in which such ties were allegedly discovered? Who is lying – Budanov or Yelensky? How should we now regard Zelensky's statements about "spiritual occupation," about the “UOC being controlled by Russian special services,” and other streams of consciousness?
It turns out that because of a few phrases from a top official, the entire false construction on which the authorities and "patriots" have been building their campaign of persecution against the UOC in recent years suddenly began to fall apart.
And now a large-scale wave of court proceedings is unfolding to ban the governing structures and monasteries of the UOC. For Yelensky and his State Ethnopolitics Service, Budanov's statement came at a very inopportune time: it will now be much more difficult to convince judges of their case.
At first glance, the words of the OP head seem unexpected, but in essence they merely state the obvious: the "witch hunt" staged in the 21st century in the very center of Europe cannot last forever.
Of course, this is not even the beginning of the state's return to democratic norms in relation to its own citizens, but it is the first serious wake-up call.
Read also
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.