On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
The OP chief Kyrylo Budanov. Photo: Budanov's Telegram channel
The OP chief Kyrylo Budanov, at a meeting with journalists, stated that the UOC cannot be called the "Moscow Patriarchate," and that pressure in the spiritual field is unacceptable. These words might seem like a Captain Obvious-style remark, but in today's Ukraine they had an effect of a bombshell. The video with Budanov was massively reposted on social networks by both supporters of the UOC and its opponents. In the first camp – restrained optimism, in the second – indignation. Moreover, UOC haters are raising quite reasonable questions: if the UOC has no ties to Moscow, then what is the value of the “studies” by the State Ethnopolitics Service, in which such ties were allegedly discovered? Who is lying – Budanov or Yelensky? How should we now regard Zelensky's statements about "spiritual occupation," about the “UOC being controlled by Russian special services,” and other streams of consciousness?
It turns out that because of a few phrases from a top official, the entire false construction on which the authorities and "patriots" have been building their campaign of persecution against the UOC in recent years suddenly began to fall apart.
And now a large-scale wave of court proceedings is unfolding to ban the governing structures and monasteries of the UOC. For Yelensky and his State Ethnopolitics Service, Budanov's statement came at a very inopportune time: it will now be much more difficult to convince judges of their case.
At first glance, the words of the OP head seem unexpected, but in essence they merely state the obvious: the "witch hunt" staged in the 21st century in the very center of Europe cannot last forever.
Of course, this is not even the beginning of the state's return to democratic norms in relation to its own citizens, but it is the first serious wake-up call.
Read also
Clergy “busification,” or the routine genocide of Orthodox priests
The video of masked men grabbing a priest by his arms and legs and throwing him into a van shocked many people. It was the first time we had seen a clergyman treated this way with our own eyes.
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.