Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity
A shattered statue of the Mother of God. Photo: Yuriy Lohaza’s Facebook page
UGCC cleric Teodor Dutchak is indignant that vandals have smashed statues of the Mother of God in a chapel in his native village in Ternopil region for the second time in a week. He stresses that in Western Ukraine this is no longer an accident, but a systemic phenomenon. After all, only recently vandals poured paint over a statue of the Mother of God in Zhovkva, Lviv region.
“Something is not right in the head of a person who destroys what belongs to another religion, who despises people who go to another church. This is abnormal. If a person is normal, then wherever he lives, he must treat every confession with respect,” Dutchak emphasizes.
According to him, “it is very bitter and painful to realize that we live in our Christian state – not under oppression and persecution as before, not underground, but in a free country – and yet such things still happen.” Dutchak “does not know” “what drives people to this.”
But we, perhaps, do know. It is quite possible that Dutchak himself, along with his colleagues, has indirectly had a hand in this problem of vandalism by allowing himself to incite hatred against the UOC. For example, Dutchak recently published a Facebook post calling for the “Moscow priests” to be driven out of the Pochaiv Lavra and sent to “Putin and Gundyayev.” Another UGCC monk, Makariy Dutka, declared that “illiterate and zombified” people attend the UOC. As for the “exploits” of OCU clerics, there is no need to say anything at all. Do we see here “respect for another confession,” for people “who go to another church”? The question answers itself.
UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that inciting hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against the arsonists themselves. If some Christians hate and insult other Christians, if they permit themselves to persecute them, seize their churches, and destroy them, then ultimately the same may be done to them as well.
In 1945, the German pastor Martin Niemöller delivered a speech in which he tried to explain the passivity of German intellectuals toward the Nazis:
“First they came for the socialists, and I remained silent – because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I remained silent – because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I remained silent – because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me.”
Only the German intellectuals merely kept silent.
The “patriotic confessions” began it themselves.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.