Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
Monk Varsanofiy. Photo: Sviatohirsk Lavra
A debate is now unfolding among Orthodox Christians over whether the death of Sviatohirsk monk Varsonofiy should be regarded as an act of confession of faith. It intensified after wounded novice Andriy Kyriienko said that before the attack, men in uniform demanded that he give the “correct” response to the slogan “Glory to Ukraine!” Andriy answered: “Glory to our Lord God. Save and protect us.” He survived only because, after stabbing him several times, the attackers assumed he was dead and threw him into a ravine.
According to UOJ information, a similar exchange took place with another wounded monk, Grigory. In his case, however, the choice was stated plainly before the attack: either he responded “correctly” to “Glory to Ukraine!” and lived, or he died.
We have no reliable evidence that slain monk Varsonofiy was given the same ultimatum. But the last words heard by the brethren who found him shortly before his death were: “Glory to the Lord Jesus Christ!.. I am a monk.” It is reasonable to assume that he said the same thing to his killers. Otherwise, Father Varsonofiy would have remained alive.
And yet many now object that things are “not so clear-cut”: the attackers have not been identified, their motive still has to be investigated, it is unknown whether Father Varsonofiy was explicitly ordered to renounce Christ, whether the attack was driven by religious hatred, and so on.
But consider what other motive the killers could have had.
Personal hostility? Kyriienko said he had never seen the attackers before. Most likely, the same was true of the other monks who were attacked.
Revenge? The same problem applies: people do not take revenge on complete strangers. There is simply nothing to avenge.
Robbery? Kyriienko said nothing about any attempt to rob them. And what valuables could a novice or monk realistically have in his pockets? That explanation does not withstand scrutiny either.
That leaves one motive: religious hatred.
The killers came to an Orthodox monastery and, after hearing “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. And the crucial point is that the victims were given a choice: give the “right” answer – and live.
For us, the word “confessor” carries enormous weight. It evokes the spiritual courage of the confessors and martyrs of centuries past. That is only natural, and it means the term must be used with great care.
But neither should we refuse to see what is right in front of us.
Read also
Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?
There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.
On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem
If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?