Kiev Patriarchate Routine: Forgery and Fraud with the State Register
Not so long ago the news, citing the deputy director of the State Department for Culture, Religions and Nationalities in Ternopil region Igor Kulchytskyi, was published on the site risu.org.ua. The official stated that the Kremenets District Court had refused to consider an appeal of the UOC community of Bashuky village because the community ceased to exist as a legal entity. However, he forgot to say that the parishioners of the canonical Orthodox Church had lost their legal status as a result of the criminal actions of the Kiev Patriarchate representatives and the governor of Ternopil region Stepan Barna.
The church in Bashuky village was seized in June, 2015. The community of the UOC decided to assert their rights in a civilized way. They went to the police and filed a claim in court. Meanwhile, representatives of the UOC-KP held the so-called "referendum" in the village, which, as it has been explained not once by the head of NGO "Public Advocacy", human rights activist Oleg Denisov, is null and void. In fact, this is a survey among some groups of individuals. However, the UOC-KP activists regard the results of these surveys as a sufficient reason for a raider seizure of other people's religious buildings and structures.
On September 4, the Kiev Patriarchate supporters came to the governor Barna with dubious documents, which were supposed to verify the results of the quasi-referendum. One of the papers was said to be the minutes of the UOC parish meeting. The "protocol" stated that the community wants to make changes in the state register in order to change the jurisdiction - to become part of the Kiev Patriarchate.
It is clear to any normal person that the document is a fake. If only because the UOC parishioners openly opposed raider actions of Filaret followers at the time when the "protocol" was made. However, Stepan Barna got satisfied with the fake. The governor signed a regulation on making changes to the registry, and subject officers replaced "UOC" for "UOC-KP." By the same serial number, with a stroke of a bureaucratic pen, on the basis of the forgery, they cancelled one legal entity and created another.
The parishioners, members of the general meeting of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church parish, tried to get across to the authorities of the Ternopil Regional State Administration, that the parish meeting of Bashuky village hadn’t made any decision on the transition to the jurisdiction of the so-called Kiev Patriarchate. They also put the results of the unlawful "referendum" in issue. However, officials of the regional administration acted at an alarming rate. Documents to replace one community for another were issued in record time.
Immediately after that, the representatives of the Ternopil Regional State Administration intervened into the legal action brought by the UOC community against the UOC-KP. Officials of the regional administration, who participated in the proceedings as a third party, suddenly announced a well-thought petition that the case should be closed because there is no UOC community any more, and therefore, there is no complainant. The same thesis later was announced by Mr. Kulchytskyi.
It is strange that neither Kulchytskyi nor the governor Barna and his subordinates know the Ukrainian law. According to Part 3, Clause 8 of the Law of Ukraine "On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organizations", even if the community loses the status of a legal entity, it exists and enjoys all the rights, as the state registration of the religious community is not at all mandatory.
Or maybe they know but defiantly continue discrimination of Ukrainian citizens on religious grounds. Moreover, they interfere with the judicial process. Fortunately, on November 24, the Ternopil Court of Appeal ordered the Kremenets District Court to reopen the case to invalidate the decision of the parish community of Bashuky village.
Let's hope that this time the parishioners of the UOC will be able to defend their rights. Moreover, that in a similar case the Kremenets District Court of 11.27.2015 has already invalidated the protocol of the "general meeting" of the community, on the basis of which the UOC community was re-registered in the Kiev Patriarchate.
Read also
Ukraine’s religious survey: measuring faith or measuring narratives?
A recent survey by the Rating Group paints a reassuring picture of Ukraine’s religious landscape. Yet a closer look at the numbers suggests something far less encouraging – both for religion and for the unity of Ukrainian society.
Children of one schism: How Kyiv Patriarchate became Phanar's unpaid bill
From the standpoint of Phanar’s own logic, Nikodym’s “ordinations” should be more canonical than Epifaniy’s – not less.
Lights on? The meltdown over “Godfighters of Ukraine” website
They felt no fear when churches were seized, when the Church was outlawed, or when hatred was whipped up against millions of believers. Yet they suddenly became alarmed when the website “Godfighters of Ukraine” appeared. Why?
The throne of Paphos: succession or spiritual adultery?
The Metropolitan of Paphos was removed without a clear accusation or trial, and his see has already been given to another. Why believers and theologians are speaking of a canonical wound and “spiritual adultery.”
"Spiritual strength" built on blood: The truth about the Ukrainian Pantheon
The Ukrainian authorities are creating what they call a “place of spiritual strength for the nation.” But can genuine spirituality be built upon the cult of figures associated with Nazism, pogroms, and internecine violence?
UOC-KP after Filaret: Church, brand or refuge for marginals?
The Kyiv Patriarchate shows signs of active life: it accepts overseas parishes and hands out "ordinations." What is this: revival or legitimization of individuals with a troubled past?