Kiev Patriarchate Routine: Forgery and Fraud with the State Register
Not so long ago the news, citing the deputy director of the State Department for Culture, Religions and Nationalities in Ternopil region Igor Kulchytskyi, was published on the site risu.org.ua. The official stated that the Kremenets District Court had refused to consider an appeal of the UOC community of Bashuky village because the community ceased to exist as a legal entity. However, he forgot to say that the parishioners of the canonical Orthodox Church had lost their legal status as a result of the criminal actions of the Kiev Patriarchate representatives and the governor of Ternopil region Stepan Barna.
The church in Bashuky village was seized in June, 2015. The community of the UOC decided to assert their rights in a civilized way. They went to the police and filed a claim in court. Meanwhile, representatives of the UOC-KP held the so-called "referendum" in the village, which, as it has been explained not once by the head of NGO "Public Advocacy", human rights activist Oleg Denisov, is null and void. In fact, this is a survey among some groups of individuals. However, the UOC-KP activists regard the results of these surveys as a sufficient reason for a raider seizure of other people's religious buildings and structures.
On September 4, the Kiev Patriarchate supporters came to the governor Barna with dubious documents, which were supposed to verify the results of the quasi-referendum. One of the papers was said to be the minutes of the UOC parish meeting. The "protocol" stated that the community wants to make changes in the state register in order to change the jurisdiction - to become part of the Kiev Patriarchate.
It is clear to any normal person that the document is a fake. If only because the UOC parishioners openly opposed raider actions of Filaret followers at the time when the "protocol" was made. However, Stepan Barna got satisfied with the fake. The governor signed a regulation on making changes to the registry, and subject officers replaced "UOC" for "UOC-KP." By the same serial number, with a stroke of a bureaucratic pen, on the basis of the forgery, they cancelled one legal entity and created another.
The parishioners, members of the general meeting of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church parish, tried to get across to the authorities of the Ternopil Regional State Administration, that the parish meeting of Bashuky village hadn’t made any decision on the transition to the jurisdiction of the so-called Kiev Patriarchate. They also put the results of the unlawful "referendum" in issue. However, officials of the regional administration acted at an alarming rate. Documents to replace one community for another were issued in record time.
Immediately after that, the representatives of the Ternopil Regional State Administration intervened into the legal action brought by the UOC community against the UOC-KP. Officials of the regional administration, who participated in the proceedings as a third party, suddenly announced a well-thought petition that the case should be closed because there is no UOC community any more, and therefore, there is no complainant. The same thesis later was announced by Mr. Kulchytskyi.
It is strange that neither Kulchytskyi nor the governor Barna and his subordinates know the Ukrainian law. According to Part 3, Clause 8 of the Law of Ukraine "On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organizations", even if the community loses the status of a legal entity, it exists and enjoys all the rights, as the state registration of the religious community is not at all mandatory.
Or maybe they know but defiantly continue discrimination of Ukrainian citizens on religious grounds. Moreover, they interfere with the judicial process. Fortunately, on November 24, the Ternopil Court of Appeal ordered the Kremenets District Court to reopen the case to invalidate the decision of the parish community of Bashuky village.
Let's hope that this time the parishioners of the UOC will be able to defend their rights. Moreover, that in a similar case the Kremenets District Court of 11.27.2015 has already invalidated the protocol of the "general meeting" of the community, on the basis of which the UOC community was re-registered in the Kiev Patriarchate.
Read also
Who will tell a bishop he is wrong?
Why is confidence in one’s own rightness so easily mistaken for spiritual growth – and why is this conversation not only about bishops?
“Want to eat sausage? Go ahead!”: Why OCU is doing away with fasting
Sausage during the Dormition Fast, milk during the Nativity Fast, “everyone sets their own rules.” Oikonomia presupposes a norm from which exceptions may be made. Here, the norm itself is nixed.
Scandal in Lviv: Why it is pointless for the UOC to prove its patriotism
Metropolitan Filaret gave Lviv a building for a rehabilitation center for wounded soldiers. Yet “patriots” demanded an explanation as to why a UOC bishop was present at its opening.
How the authorities are trying to destroy UOC abroad
Ukrainian communities across Europe are being accused of espionage and “Russian influence.” The evidence? Holding church services, helping refugees, working with children, and singing Ukrainian Christmas carols.
Should the Church be "with the people" or with God?
The authorities do not need patriots – they need the obedient. Why attempts to prove loyalty do not stop the persecution, and how this ended for the Church in the 20th century.
The implications of recognizing Pochaiv Lavra's "affiliation"
DESS has recognized the Pochaiv Lavra as affiliated with the ROC on the grounds that the Lavra belongs to the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. This is a step toward banning the monastery. But it is also a template that will be applied further.