LGBT support in the main university of Uniates
The story began in the spring of 2015, when one of the students of this university Christina Kutniv publicly protested against the fact that a man who boasts of his homosexual orientation teaches at the Catholic school.
On her Facebook page, she wrote: "I wonder how such a person can teach something at the UCU." This teacher, Vladimir Beglov by name, even managed to give an interview to "Radio Liberty" about his sexual preferences. Interestingly, on the day following Christine Kutniv’s post, the interview, published on the website of "Radio Liberty" in 2012, was miraculously transformed and Beglov’s name disappeared from it. But the screenshots as manuscripts – do not burn!
Another UCU teacher, now popular Ukrainian deputy Sergey Leshchenko, took part in the Kiev gay parade in 2015. His participation Leshchenko commented in the following way: "This photo is a sign of changes in Ukraine, and the LGBT community for the first time could openly hold the event in defense of their rights. Democratic values are coming out of hiding."
But the real scandal began to flare up once the US professor Alexander Sich started to work at the UCU. He has published a number of articles in the edition "Katolitsky Oglyadach (Catholic Observer)", in which he pointed out that in the University impermissible as for the Christian institution views on sexual relations are progressing both among teachers and a large part of the students.
The latter, in particular, spend their free time at the hostel watching pornography, which is confirmed in written form by the rector of UCU Boris Gudziak, according to Alexander Sich But the students are a consequence.
When the issue of homosexual sympathies among UCU attendees began to go beyond the university framework, many were struck by the words of the vice-rector of the UCU Myroslav Marynovych, who said: "We have to understand that at this stage we do not achieve clarity because unclear is the position of the Church itself on the question of sexual ethics."
Not surprisingly, with such a leadership position, many of the students support the ideology of the LGBT community in general, and gay pride parades in particular.
Several priests of the UGCC, in particular Orest-Dmytro Vilchynsky and Yuri Boyko, rightly criticized the policy of the university authorities.
It turned out that homophilic liberal views are no accident at this University. Back in 2012 the Department of the Faculty of Humanities of the UCU launched a training course on gender – the so-called "gender studies lectures." The aim of the course is "the need of training programs that encourage young Ukrainians to critically assess gender norms and stereotypes common in Ukraine."
What is meant by the so-called "critical assessment of gender stereotypes"? It means that the purpose of gender studies is the destruction of the traditional family and moral standards and the promotion of perversion as the norm.
You may ask how a Catholic institution can promote perversions. Just money is the simple answer.
This course is funded by the Union of Ukrainian Women of America, whose head Mariana Zayats presented the rector of the UCU Gudziak a check for $ 25,000. Patriarch Sviatoslav Shevchuk, who was present at this act, called the initiative "remarkable" and said that "this is probably the first university in Ukraine which starts such an innovative program."
In general, according to the publication in the "New time", Ukraine funds only 9% of the UCU budget. Its main sponsors are the European funds (35% of the annual amount of income) and the USA – religious organizations, Ukrainian diaspora structures, foundations and individual philanthropists (34%). And the views of the majority of sponsors have nothing to do with traditional Christian values.
The same Alexander Sich writes: "Archbishop Boris Gudziak, president of the UCU, more than six years ago (and many times after that), was warned that the Director of Development of the Ukrainian Catholic Education Foundation UCEF, based in the United States and Canada, said to my wife and me that "the Church is wrong" and "homosexual" marriage "is natural and should be permissible."
The "Renaissance" Fund, which is one of the main sponsors of the UCU, in 2013 "nominated" "discriminator of the year" former MP V. Kolesnichenko who dared to introduce a bill to the Verkhovna Rada "On the prohibition of propaganda of same-sex sexual relations to children." Uniate priest Orest- Dmytro Vilchynsky in his publication "UCU, gay scandal and liberal fascism" writes: "The cooperation between the UCU and the "Renaissance" Fund is developing, the master's program on history continues to "offer great opportunities for the application of new areas of research – such as gender studio", teachers who publicly express beliefs that are incompatible with the Catholic status of the UCU, keep teaching at the UCU.
The university authorities are trying hard to make critics (mostly priests of the UGCC) "keep their mouth shut", demanding that they "do not rock the boat." Some LGBT activists even threatened them with physical violence!
Vice-rector of the UCU M. Marynoviych called the criticism an attempt of raider attack and addressed Uniate clergy phrases that sounds more like a threat, an ultimatum and blackmail – all in one, "I wouldn’t remind the Archbishops of the sin of homosexuality or pedophilia, which occurs as frequently in the Church as in secular society. If the Church does not stop the practice of anti-ideological campaign, it will receive in response the same public opposition, which the Church in the West and even in Catholic Poland has already got."
These confrontations resulted in a conflict situation among the Uniates, which can be called the split between supporters of the traditional Christian values of their Church, and the liberals in the UCU leadership, backed by Western money and new sponsors, driven by essentially anti-Christian ideas of LGBT and gender. This conflict can only be resolved by the head of the Greek Catholic Church. And he did it. On September 11 at the consecration of a new church of the University, Sviatoslav Shevchuk expressed his full support for the leadership of the UCU. According to the speaker of the UGCC Igor Yatsiv Shevchuk’s statement on this issue is an informal response to an ultimatum by M.Marynovych but it can be regarded as the official position of the UGCC.
Many of the problems of mankind in all ages have always boiled down to a simple choice: wealth or conscience, fraud or a pure heart. In the case of Uniate leaders this option sounds a bit different: money or loyalty to Christ.
Some will say that this is the problem of Uniates. And they will be wrong. In the context of the recently announced by Sviatoslav Shevchuk expansion of the UGCC to the East, now this is the problem of all Ukrainians.
Read also
1946 revisited: The UGCC’s suppression anniversary and today's UOC crisis
On the 80th anniversary of the Lviv Council, which decided on the reunification of the Greek Catholics with Orthodoxy, it makes sense to draw some parallels with the current situation surrounding the UOC.
What the Razumkov Center’s religious statistics show
The Razumkov Center sociologists have published religious statistics for Ukraine over the past 25 years. Where are the lies, where are the manipulations, and where are the facts that cannot be hidden.
“As for the OCU issue, we must find a solution that works for everyone”
The UOJ in America interviews His Beatitude John, Archbishop of Tirana, Durres, and All Albania.
The Bible and the Third Temple: What lies behind the U.S.–Israel war in Iran
How the religious doctrine of American evangelicals shapes U.S. policy in the Middle East.
Why are the authorities and the OCU “reopening” Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra?
Ukrainian officials and the OCU keep taking Lavra churches away – yet they “open” the caves. What is the farce here, and what do they really need it for?
Religious “advocacy” of the authorities is inherited from Soviet times
The Ukrainian authorities delegate religious leaders to the West to give the impression that there is no persecution of the Church in the country. The USSR government did exactly the same. We illustrate this with examples.