Is it possible for Ukrainians to prove to the state that they’re Ukrainian?

DESS grounds its research on Russian documents. Photo: UOJ

Imagine you are a resident of Mariupol, Berdiansk, or any other city in the occupied territory, and you have fled to Ukrainian-controlled areas. Now, you need to receive assistance from the state or at least a certificate that you are registered in a Ukrainian city and are a Ukrainian citizen. But the response you get is that you are not Ukrainian. They claim that the Russian Constitution states that Mariupol, Berdiansk, etc. are Russian territories, meaning they are Russian.

Think this is fiction? Well, it's actually the reality.

The State Ethnopolitics Service has outlined the signs of "affiliation" of UOC communities with the ROC, which they plan to use as grounds for banning them. There are 7 such signs. However, just one is enough to impose a ban. Let's quote item 4: "In the documents and decisions of a religious organization whose activities are banned in Ukraine, there are signs of the entry into its structure of a religious organization operating in Ukraine."

In simpler terms, if the ROC documents state that the UOC is part of its structure, this is enough for the Ukrainian authorities to ban any communities, monasteries, or eparchies of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. And the fact that the UOC's statute has no links to the Moscow Patriarchate is of no interest.

And this is the most cognitive of all the dissonances. The Russian Church is considered by Ukrainian authorities as part of the Kremlin's ideology. Criminal cases are opened against its hierarchs, and sanctions are imposed. Yet, the same ROC documents are used by the Ukrainian state as a basis for enacting legislative acts.

This is, of course, a disgrace and a complete lack of basic logic.

If someone recognizes the legitimacy of Russian documents that declare the Crimea and the Donbas as Russian, criminal cases are opened against them.

However, if someone recognizes the legitimacy of Russian documents that declare UOC communities as Russian, they are considered patriots and great state figures. And not just recognizing them as legitimate, but also using Russian documents to create Ukrainian laws.

This is so strange that you can only be left confused. Maybe someone needs psychiatric help?

Read also

Orthodoxy and LGBT: Has the first domino fallen?

The Council of the Finnish Church has endorsed LGBT rights and supporters of gender ideology.

On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group

The Ecumenical Patriarchate never ceases to astonish.

Opening a bust of Mazepa: A new era for Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra. Or not?

Do Zelensky, Yelensky, and the rest of the Kotliarevska cohort truly believe that, in the Lavra, prayer should be displaced by these absurd Soviet-style spectacles?

The UOC and the end of the Yermak era

The man who clearly played a major role in the processes unfolding between the authorities and the UOC has stepped down.

On the harassment of a Russian speaking child by “OCU atheist”

A scandal is now raging online over the latest outburst of a language activist who decided to “cut down to size” a 3-year-old displaced girl.

Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan

“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the head of the Finnish Church protested.