Discrediting church awards

Dumenko awarding Haidai with a church order. Photo: OCU

On August 2, 2025, NABU and SAP officers arrested the head of the Mukachevo District Administration and former head of the Luhansk Regional Military Administration, Serhiy Haidai, for large-scale corruption.

Haidai is a recipient of several awards from the OCU, including the Order of the Archangel Michael. He visited Dumenko at his residence, stood alongside him during a “liturgy” in the St. Cyril Church in Kyiv, which had been seized from the UOC, and even promoted the strange idea of making this church the seat of the OCU’s Luhansk eparchy.

In short – a full merger of the official and Dumenko’s structure. And yet, it remains unclear for what exactly Dumenko was awarding him. Haidai has no notable merits before the Orthodox faith – nor could he possibly have any.

Or is it really unclear? It’s perfectly clear: Dumenko hands out church awards to anyone who might be of use to him. At nearly every meeting with officials, ambassadors, or diplomats, Serhii Petrovych bestows a certificate, medal, or order on his guests.

One might say there’s no reason to question such behavior – it entirely fits the spiritual and moral portrait of Dumenko. It’s natural for him.

But there’s a catch. Until recently, similar practices were found in the UOC as well. Haidai himself, according to media reports, received the Order of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker in 2017. And before the era of persecution against the UOC began, there were many such “Haidais.” Ruling hierarchs would often award local officials and administrators not for their outstanding service to the Church, but simply to maintain good relations – in effect, doing the same thing Dumenko is doing now.

Of course, the UOC is now suffering greatly; it is being persecuted and destroyed.
But at the same time, this moment offers a chance to reflect – to see ourselves as we are, to recognize what we once ignored.
And to be cleansed.

Read also

“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”

Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.

Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?

38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.

Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent

KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.

Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?

On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.

Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?

The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.