“Our children will smash your children's faces”
Nitsoy calls for beating Russian-speaking children. Photo: KyivFM
The well-known children’s writer and staunch defender of the state language, Larysa Nitsoy, declared on a television broadcast that Ukrainian-speaking children will “smash the faces” of Russian-speaking ones, and that true patriots are raising them this way:
“We are raising them to smash the faces of Moscow-leaning children. And this is not a signal for the children. I want the parents of those Moscow-leaning children to finally hear this signal. We are warning that their children will face problems – from our children, from our grandchildren… We are saying: ‘And we will smash your children’s faces’… We are simply warning you that the conflict will continue into your children, and no one will endure it anymore. Ukrainians will not endure it. They will not.”
One could dismiss this as the private opinion of one not particularly refined woman. Unfortunately, it is not. For the past 11 years, figures like Nitsoy have been deliberately elevated by the authorities into positions of public influence. They are invited onto TV channels, published in the media, and their words are promoted as correct and patriotic.
This has led to a country effectively divided into “patriots” and “vatniks,” the “right” people and the “wrong” people, the “Aryans” and the “Untermenschen.” And the demarkation line is not always the language. Among believers of the “FSB-controlled” UOC there are countless Ukrainian-speakers who speak more purely and correctly than the most ostentatious “patriots.” Yet they too are treated as second-class people – ones who today may be humiliated and discriminated against.
One can easily recall, for example, the call of OCU cleric R. Hryshchuk to kill the parishioners of the UOC cathedral in Chernivtsi, who on June 17 had driven out the OCU thugs from their holy place.
Both Hryshchuk and Nitsoy – and many others – openly incite violence without the slightest fear. No criminal case for incitement to hatred will ever be opened against them, for they have received an unspoken mandate from the authorities. And Nitsoy has now voiced something crucial – that the supposed “right” of “first-class” Ukrainians to commit violence against “second-class” Ukrainians will be passed down to their children.
That the “Aryan” children will have the full right to beat the “Untermenschen.” This logic may even extend into religion: children of OCU members will oppress the children of UOC believers. Such is the “bright future” being drawn for us.
But the question remains – how long can a “united Ukraine” endure under such an ideology?
Read also
From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed
In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.
Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?
A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.
“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”
One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.
Why people heroize those who beat TRC
Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?
On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk
Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?
Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?
So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.