“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”
Between St. Basil the Great and Bandera, the OCU chooses Bandera. Collage: UOJ
The issue of changing the church calendar sparks heated arguments mainly because of the celebration of Christmas. Yet besides this most important feast there are many others as well. For example, on January 1 according to the New Style, the Church celebrates the feast day of St. Basil the Great and the Circumcision of the Lord. And although these feasts are not among the Twelve Great Feasts, they are among the most important in church tradition. One might recall, for instance, the texts of Christmas carols: “And the second feast is that of Saint Basil…”
At this point the reader is likely to wonder why we are stating such obvious things. The reason is that in OCU and UGCC circles, January 1 in recent years has been firmly “staked out” as the celebration of Bandera’s birthday. And before the war, many clergy and believers would take part on that day in torchlight marches.
Since Dumenko has said that his subordinates are proud when they are called “Banderites,” we decided to check: has anything changed in the OCU with the introduction of the new calendar? Have church feasts displaced the celebration of the birthday of “our father Bandera”?
On the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers” – Roman Hryshchuk, Oleksandr Dediukhin, and Serhii Tkachuk – on January 1 there are congratulations posted for Bandera’s birthday, but there are no publications whatsoever dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision. It seems that, in the souls of these clerics, Stepan Andriyovych has remained in first place. However, there is another possibility.
In church practice there is a tradition whereby, when dates coincide, a less significant feast is transferred to another day. In the Typikon, special notes are provided for such cases: what is transferred, and where.
According to information from sources, in some OCU parishes such footnotes have appeared: “If it should happen that the birthday of Bandera falls on the Circumcision of the Lord, then we sing nothing at all for the Circumcision.”
Still, perhaps it is slander.
Read also
Do Ukrainians without heat and eeectricity really do nothing but rejoice and dance?
The head of the UGCC has repeatedly criticized the U.S. plan for achieving peace. And now he speaks as though Ukrainians are ready to endure the war for as long as necessary – they are being ground down, and yet they do nothing but sing and dance.
When every UOC church in Lviv Region is shut down – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Galicia, the authorities have effectively outlawed the UOC and are hunting down “underground” services – while in the United States they solemnly insist that no one in Ukraine is persecuted for their faith.
Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes
The Phanar is convinced that Dumenko “stands firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights.”
Dumenko’s “dialogue” appeal to the UOC: sincerity or strategy?
If the OCU truly wanted dialogue, it would decide to halt seizures and return what was taken.
Where did the circus go? It was here just yesterday
At an Orthodox Church of Ukraine “service” with Epifaniy (Dumenko) in the seized cathedral in Volodymyr, there are people. But the very next day – without Epifaniy – there are no people.
Why instigators of hatred against the UOC should be in prison
Churches were not built for one state to defeat another, not for the triumph of an “Ukrainian spirit,” and not for the “spirit” of any other nation.