Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes

Patriarch Bartholomew and Serhii Dumenko. Photo: AP

Patriarch Bartholomew sent Serhiy Dumenko congratulations on the anniversary of his enthronement and on his birthday. The letter is composed in the familiar traditions of elevated Byzantine rhetoric. In this case, however, that style can only provoke a sarcastic smile because of its glaring contrast with objective reality.

“The seed of grace sown then, watered by the sweat and the prayer of your love, has borne abundant fruits – as a living testimony to the presence of the Holy Spirit the Comforter among the pious Ukrainian people.”

What exactly does the Patriarch see as the “abundant fruits” of the “prayer of love” of his protégé? In the mass seizures of UOC churches and physical violence by OCU clergy? In the deception surrounding staged, fake “transfers” and Dumenko’s constant insistence that everything is happening “voluntarily”? In the obvious division and hostility among Ukrainians that have arisen as a result of the OCU leader’s actions? Is this really how the presence and work of the Holy Spirit are to be understood?

Let us simply recall the Apostle Paul’s words: “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control” (Gal. 5:22–23). Do the fruits of Dumenko’s work correspond to these words?

“Your Beatitude, as a good shepherd and a vigilant watchman, you stand firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights, comforting, strengthening, and inspiring the spiritual flock entrusted to you by God.”

Where, concretely, does Patriarch Bartholomew see Epifaniy’s “spiritual heights”? In the lies, hatred, and divisions he sows among Ukrainians? Or in the fact that he, as a “professor of theology,” appears not to know the Gospel, referring to Christ’s words as mere “proverbs”?

“The wisdom, prudence, and piety by which you are guided in this difficult and responsible time fully justify the hopes of the Mother Church.”

This is the key phrase that explains all the preceding absurdities. Even if Epifaniy were personally sawing off the locks of UOC churches and beating its bishops over the head with a club, he would still “justify the hopes of the Mother Church.” Why?

Because the Mother Church, by definition, cannot be mistaken. All decisions of her Patriarch, as the head of Orthodoxy, are infallible – including the creation of the OCU. And anyone who doubts this is, of course, an agent of the Kremlin.

Read also

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.

Why has the Culture Ministry not been banned yet?

There are numerous traitors and collaborators within the Ministry of Culture, the Verkhovna Rada, and the SBU. Yet for some reason, only the UOC is labeled “pro-Moscow.”