Prayer for Zelensky

Dumenko in the Verkhovna Rada. Photo: OCU

Dumenko read a prayer for Ukraine from the rostrum of the Verkhovna Rada. As usual, from a sheet of paper. It contained the following words:

“Strengthen our warriors, the president, the Verkhovna Rada, the authorities, the government, and all our Ukrainian people, who are resisting the treacherous Russian aggressor on land, at sea, and in the air. Grant us victory in Thy name and establish a just peace.”

Why are we writing about this? Because the entire “prayer” rhetoric of today’s patriotic confessions, in its pathos, is becoming more and more caricature-like and is sliding into frankly grotesque forms.

How do we pray for our country in the Church services? “For its authorities and armed forces.” That is enough. We do not spell things out to God: help the missile troops separately, or the Ministry of Economy, or the Committee on Humanitarian Policy. God is the Knower of hearts. He knows all our thoughts before they are even spoken.

But if a “metropolitan” composes, for a trip to the Rada, a prayer in which the president is listed separately, the Rada separately, the government separately, then we understand – these words are not addressed to God at all, but to the people who invited him into the Rada: Zelensky, Stefanchuk, the MPs, and so on.

And one more thing. Is it really necessary, in a prayer, to tell God that the aggressor is “treacherous”? That we are asking for help “on land, at sea, and in the air”? That our defenders are “courageous,” while the aggressor’s designs are “devilish”? One would think Christ knows far better than we do where the struggle is taking place, and who is treacherous and who is brave. And Serhiy Dumenko cannot fail to understand this. Yet he says it anyway. Why?

Because that is what they want to hear in the hall. That is the language normally used from the parliamentary rostrum. If you remove Dumenko’s final “amen” from the text, you are left with a typical speech by the average MP, complete with “a just peace,” “the treacherous Russian aggressor,” and other political clichés.

Still, one has to admit: speeches from the Rada’s rostrum are usually delivered with more inspiration. In acting skills, Epifaniy is clearly outmatched by the politicians.

Read also

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.