Prayer for Zelensky

Dumenko in the Verkhovna Rada. Photo: OCU

Dumenko read a prayer for Ukraine from the rostrum of the Verkhovna Rada. As usual, from a sheet of paper. It contained the following words:

“Strengthen our warriors, the president, the Verkhovna Rada, the authorities, the government, and all our Ukrainian people, who are resisting the treacherous Russian aggressor on land, at sea, and in the air. Grant us victory in Thy name and establish a just peace.”

Why are we writing about this? Because the entire “prayer” rhetoric of today’s patriotic confessions, in its pathos, is becoming more and more caricature-like and is sliding into frankly grotesque forms.

How do we pray for our country in the Church services? “For its authorities and armed forces.” That is enough. We do not spell things out to God: help the missile troops separately, or the Ministry of Economy, or the Committee on Humanitarian Policy. God is the Knower of hearts. He knows all our thoughts before they are even spoken.

But if a “metropolitan” composes, for a trip to the Rada, a prayer in which the president is listed separately, the Rada separately, the government separately, then we understand – these words are not addressed to God at all, but to the people who invited him into the Rada: Zelensky, Stefanchuk, the MPs, and so on.

And one more thing. Is it really necessary, in a prayer, to tell God that the aggressor is “treacherous”? That we are asking for help “on land, at sea, and in the air”? That our defenders are “courageous,” while the aggressor’s designs are “devilish”? One would think Christ knows far better than we do where the struggle is taking place, and who is treacherous and who is brave. And Serhiy Dumenko cannot fail to understand this. Yet he says it anyway. Why?

Because that is what they want to hear in the hall. That is the language normally used from the parliamentary rostrum. If you remove Dumenko’s final “amen” from the text, you are left with a typical speech by the average MP, complete with “a just peace,” “the treacherous Russian aggressor,” and other political clichés.

Still, one has to admit: speeches from the Rada’s rostrum are usually delivered with more inspiration. In acting skills, Epifaniy is clearly outmatched by the politicians.

Read also

Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions

Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?

Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?

There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.

On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem

If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?

UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then

By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.

A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”

Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”

On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra

After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.