Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment
Authorities offer UOC clergy a choice: call themselves "Moscow priests" or go to the front
Over the recent period, several events have occurred that may not seem directly related, but are part of one whole.
1️⃣On April 6, the Court of Appeals overturned the DESS decision to approve the expert examination on the UOC's ties with the ROC. Three days later, the head of the OP Budanov stated that calling the UOC the "Moscow Patriarchate" is manipulation, and that the UOC has broken ties with the ROC.
2️⃣In parallel, we hear almost daily about abductions of UOC clergy by TRC employees. The latest case, when Volyn military commissars attacked the bishop, secretary, and deacon of the Volodymyr-Volynsky Eparchy, was shocking. Despite the fact that they had draft exemptions, and Metropolitan Volodymyr had even been removed from military registration altogether, the recruitment officers behaved extremely aggressively, while priest Oleksandr Kobenko was pepper-sprayed and beaten.
3️⃣Deputy head of DESS Voinalovych made a statement explaining why the TRC is hunting the UOC clergy. The reason is the UOC refuses to call itself the "Moscow Patriarchate".
Back under Poroshenko in 2018, a law was passed on the forced renaming of the UOC to ROCinU. And at the end of 2023, when Zelensky chose the course to destroy the UOC, the court declared this law effective. Moreover, the court's arguments were identical to the DESS "expertise" overturned by the sensational decision of April 6, 2026: the UOC was called "ROCinU" based on provisions of Russian documents. That is, UOC priests are being taken to the front because they refuse to call themselves "Muscovite".
To summarize:
• The TRC takes UOC priests to the front because the UOC doesn't want to change its name to "ROCinU". In other words, if you declare yourself a "Moscow priest", you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given an exemption. If you don't admit it – they force you to renounce your priesthood, take up arms and go to war.
• All state laws about the UOC's "ties" with Moscow (the Ministry of Culture's "expertise" of 2019, DESS's "expert examination" of 2023, and "DESS research of 2025") are built not on the UOC's Statute but on ROC documents.
• Despite the fact that some courts overturn such "ties", decisions of other courts continue to be in effect. As a result, hundreds of priests of the country's largest Orthodox denomination are abducted by military commissars and thrown to the "zero line". At the same time, numerous marginal structures of pagans or dubious sects receive exemptions without problems and feel perfectly fine.
And then the authorities brazenly assure the West that Ukraine has "freedom of faith" and "equality of denominations".
G – genocide.
Read also
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.
Ukraine’s court religions: conscience or LGBT?
“Moscow priests” will be branded not only for refusing to join the OCU and for following the Julian calendar, but also for “homophobia.”
Does Patriarch Bartholomew consider Ukrainians bearers of the "Russian World"?
The Primate of the Church of Constantinople arrived in Vilnius to introduce the newly appointed Exarch of Lithuania, Bishop Panaretos of Tamasos.
A lesson for the modern Church from the depths of ages
St. Leontius had no desire whatsoever to be “one of their own” for the local authorities or non-believers.
How the UOC Council in Feofania was turned into a “lawless gathering”
All the insults hurled at the Council – claims that it was a “mob gathering,” “filth,” “foam,” and the like – rest not on canons or facts, but solely on the emotions of those making them.