Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
Zelensky at the Lavra. Photo: Zelensky's press service
After a Russian drone struck the Dormition Cathedral, Zelensky promptly arrived at the Lavra and promised to restore the damaged church. He called what happened “barbarism” and “an open attack on the Christian community.”
And here, one cannot help but feel a certain bewilderment.
The Dormition Cathedral, like any other church, was built for prayer. From the point of view of the “Christian community,” it is no different from the most modest little church in some remote village. In both, the same Liturgy is served and the same Bloodless Sacrifice is offered.
Today, Zelensky and Ukraine’s leadership are making loud statements for an international audience and ostentatiously expressing grief over the “destruction of a shrine.” Yet just a couple of years ago, Zelensky just as ostentatiously remained silent when, under police protection, municipal workers demolished another shrine – the Tithes Monastery. Yes, that church did not have the same historical or architectural value as the Dormition Cathedral. But for any Christian, it was no less precious. And the Tithes Monastery was not an exception, but part of a system. Under Zelensky’s presidency, the UOC’s Transfiguration Church in Ivano-Frankivsk was demolished, as was St. Volodymyr’s Church in Lviv. Now the rector of the Transfiguration Church in Kyiv is sounding the alarm: his shrine, too, is facing the threat of destruction.
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the destruction of UOC churches by the Ukrainian authorities? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
In recent years, the churches of the Lavra have hosted rock concerts, cooking show shoots, performances by folk dance ensembles, government conferences, and other events that had nothing spiritual about them. For some reason, no one then said that the Lavra is a shrine, not a cultural center or a conference hall. Today, Zelensky suddenly remembered it. Why? It seems everyone knows the answer: because the Lavra is a Christian center known throughout the world. Because this topic can generate powerful hype.
Of course, attacks that destroy holy places are a crime. But that is what the enemy does. When churches were demolished by one’s own side, did that make it any easier for their parishioners?
Grief for export.
Read also
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.
Ukraine’s court religions: conscience or LGBT?
“Moscow priests” will be branded not only for refusing to join the OCU and for following the Julian calendar, but also for “homophobia.”
Does Patriarch Bartholomew consider Ukrainians bearers of the "Russian World"?
The Primate of the Church of Constantinople arrived in Vilnius to introduce the newly appointed Exarch of Lithuania, Bishop Panaretos of Tamasos.
A lesson for the modern Church from the depths of ages
St. Leontius had no desire whatsoever to be “one of their own” for the local authorities or non-believers.
How the UOC Council in Feofania was turned into a “lawless gathering”
All the insults hurled at the Council – claims that it was a “mob gathering,” “filth,” “foam,” and the like – rest not on canons or facts, but solely on the emotions of those making them.