Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
Zelensky at the Lavra. Photo: Zelensky's press service
After a Russian drone struck the Dormition Cathedral, Zelensky promptly arrived at the Lavra and promised to restore the damaged church. He called what happened “barbarism” and “an open attack on the Christian community.”
And here, one cannot help but feel a certain bewilderment.
The Dormition Cathedral, like any other church, was built for prayer. From the point of view of the “Christian community,” it is no different from the most modest little church in some remote village. In both, the same Liturgy is served and the same Bloodless Sacrifice is offered.
Today, Zelensky and Ukraine’s leadership are making loud statements for an international audience and ostentatiously expressing grief over the “destruction of a shrine.” Yet just a couple of years ago, Zelensky just as ostentatiously remained silent when, under police protection, municipal workers demolished another shrine – the Tithes Monastery. Yes, that church did not have the same historical or architectural value as the Dormition Cathedral. But for any Christian, it was no less precious. And the Tithes Monastery was not an exception, but part of a system. Under Zelensky’s presidency, the UOC’s Transfiguration Church in Ivano-Frankivsk was demolished, as was St. Volodymyr’s Church in Lviv. Now the rector of the Transfiguration Church in Kyiv is sounding the alarm: his shrine, too, is facing the threat of destruction.
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the destruction of UOC churches by the Ukrainian authorities? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
In recent years, the churches of the Lavra have hosted rock concerts, cooking show shoots, performances by folk dance ensembles, government conferences, and other events that had nothing spiritual about them. For some reason, no one then said that the Lavra is a shrine, not a cultural center or a conference hall. Today, Zelensky suddenly remembered it. Why? It seems everyone knows the answer: because the Lavra is a Christian center known throughout the world. Because this topic can generate powerful hype.
Of course, attacks that destroy holy places are a crime. But that is what the enemy does. When churches were demolished by one’s own side, did that make it any easier for their parishioners?
Grief for export.
Read also
Clergy “busification,” or the routine genocide of Orthodox priests
The video of masked men grabbing a priest by his arms and legs and throwing him into a van shocked many people. It was the first time we had seen a clergyman treated this way with our own eyes.
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.