Honoring the Bolsheviks’ successors at Kyiv Lavra

Dumenko congratulates Ostapenko on the 100th anniversary of the Lavra Reserve. Photo: Reserve’s Facebook page

Dumenko congratulates Ostapenko on the 100th anniversary of the Lavra Reserve. Photo: Reserve’s Facebook page

Serhiy Dumenko held a “prayer service” at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra to celebrate the centenary of the Soviet-created Reserve – and handed out awards to its current leadership.

According to him,

in the 1920s and 1930s, “by God’s providence, the Reserve played an important role in preserving the Lavra’s unique spiritual and cultural heritage and contributed to its restoration in modern times.”

Dumenko claims that museum workers saved the monastery “from complete destruction during the Bolshevik persecutions.”

Now let’s try something radical: logic.

Before the Bolsheviks drove the monks and faithful out of the Lavra, there was no “Lavra heritage” in need of rescue. For centuries, the brethren had cared for the monastery grounds, kept its functioning churches in splendor, built new ones, and welcomed pilgrims.

So what exactly happened 100 years ago?

All of that was brought to an end – and the “All-Ukrainian Museum Town,” later renamed the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra Reserve, appeared in its place. 

The monks were thrown out. Some were exiled. Others were shot.

And the Reserve staff were hardly heroic museum workers saving holy sites from the Bolsheviks.

They were the Bolsheviks.

It was under the Reserve that the relics of the saints were desecrated, Lavra churches were turned into an atheism museum, and toilets were installed in sanctuaries.

Of course, not every employee was a desecrator. But throughout the Soviet era, the Reserve remained part of an atheistic totalitarian system.

One need only look at the appalling condition of the Lavra churches when the state returned them to the Church in 1988.

It was not the Reserve that brought the Lavra back from ruin. It was the monks and faithful of the UOC who restored and preserved the holy sites that Serhiy Dumenko’s organization now enjoys using.

Against that history, awarding the Reserve’s current leadership looks less like a celebration than a cruel joke. Like their predecessors, today’s museum officials are taking over churches and driving out monks – only the slogans have changed.

After a centenary like this, perhaps the next step will be for Dumenko to thank the Bolsheviks themselves for “saving” the monastery. After all, they were the ones who cleared the Lavra of those troublesome “Russian World” churchmen in the first place.

Ternopil post on Feast of Intercession: Has calendar reformn failed?

A significant number of believers have rejected the new church calendar introduced by the OCU and UGCC with government support.

Shoulder straps or a cassock: who writes the script for UOC "fighters"?

Everything indicates that both Veliar and Pshenychny are ordinary performers of someone else's script. There is only one question – does the scriptwriter wear shoulder straps or a cassock?

Why is it legal to kill a person before birth but not after?

Children are the most privileged members of society. Yet that same society officially permits children to be killed – and on a massive scale.

"Degenerates" and "stupid animals": anti-UOC activists turn on children

Future historians will wonder how a vast country’s information agenda could have been shaped for so long by people so petty, vicious, and utterly contemptible.

Zelensky sees murder of Polish priest but not of Sviatohirsk monk

Why does Zelensky react so emotionally and swiftly to the murder of a Catholic cleric while remaining completely silent about the murder of an Orthodox monk?

UOC vs. OCU numbers: pollsters count, social media recount

Official polling suggests Dumenko’s structure has an overwhelming lead in the number of parishioners, while social media polls paint a very different picture. Which should we believe?