From nationalism – to homosexualism

Their loyalty is divided between God and the world, and they are unstable in everything they do. (James 1:8)

Over the last 15 years political elites of Europe have finally set a course for revising the notion of family and marriage at the legislative level. Since 2001 most Western European states have been adopting laws that enshrine “semi-sex unions” and even the rights of “homosexual couples” to foster children who’ve been expropriated from heterosexual families.  

One can affirm a tendency towards advancing such laws looks truly bulldozing. Dispersing of protestors against legalization of “same-sex marriages” in France, turning a blind eye to large-scale demonstrations in Italy, conscious  funding of LGBT-communities by American GOs and NGOs etc. Apart from that, there has gained popularity “political intimidation”, forcing the Eastern Europe countries to adopt the regulations of such kind.

If you want a “visa-free regime” – organize “gay-parades” or take an action plan, recognizing transsexuals, “same-sex cohabitations” (for a start) and other “delights”. In Ukraine this process is in full swing. Although the President personally assured representatives of the Ukrainian denominations that such laws will not be approved, it’s hard to believe his promise.

The tendency, undermining valuable social benchmarks, has also affected religious institutions of the world. The most liberal Western Protestant denominations have made it legitimate to have homosexual episcopate and even so called “gay-weddings”, among them – the Scottish Church and the Episcopal Church in the USA.

All Christian confessions in Ukraine have condemned the initiatives like that. However, some of them have yielded to the pressure of secular-liberal ideology. On the eve of holding a notorious “gay-parade” in Kiev, former chief of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic – Liubomir Guzar – gave a fairly ambiguous assessment of “homosexualism” phenomenon: “There is a fact which is not to be denied and SHOULDN’T BE DENIED, that is, there is a certain amount of people who, according to various reasons, and let’s finally admit it – BY THE WILL OF GOD – are prone to such sexual orientation. It is a fact”.     

The above statements are surprising. Recently, when giving his comments on the initiatives of the Ukrainian politicians regarding legalization of “gay-marriages”, Liubomir Guzar  said, “As for same-sex marriages, this is just abnormal. God created a man and a woman who are supposed to get married. There can’t be homosexual marriages,” he underscored. “In Western Europe and Northern America they allow for such liberalism. It resulted, as it can be seen, in belittling the morality and fundamentals of our life. This is wrong. They (representatives of sexual minorities ed.) cause much ado, organize different events, processions, as if they were the elite”.

In less than a year Guzar began to express his viewpoint in a more composed and less categorical way. Anyway, he has changed his position not for the first time. Let’s compare two of his reflections over the last years.

June 2013: “Nationalism cannot be a Christian virtue, since it is imperfect, makes a person restricted and self-centered”.   

November 2013: “Basically, the word “nationalism” indicates a positive sign of a human – love for the nation”, “it is good to be a nationalist. A lot of peoples across the globe, irrespective of the level of their culture, are proud of their nationalism”.  

One could argue that Liubomir Guzar meant something else, something different and so on. In this case he’d rather have given his opinions more clearly. “Patriotic” denominations, like the Greek-Catholic Church of Ukraine, have been evidently entrapped. On the one hand, they unquestionably lobby a course towards “eurointegration”, on the other – they are unable to abandon an entrenched Christian conservatism. There is an opinion that sooner or later they will have to “work off” the support of the state authorities, thus being hostages of the “eurointegration” course.    

Eventually, the whole Ukrainian society is going to be confronted with this dilemma: a well-situated and wealthy life or unshakeable God’s laws and Christian values. The temptation is very powerful so many will fall. We will all have to defend our values in the conditions of the liberal-secular pressure, and, to some extent, it’ll be akin to a great deed. What we must begin with is to purify our minds, because “a double minded man is unstable in all his ways”.

Read also

Who will tell a bishop he is wrong?

Why is confidence in one’s own rightness so easily mistaken for spiritual growth – and why is this conversation not only about bishops?

“Want to eat sausage? Go ahead!”: Why OCU is doing away with fasting

Sausage during the Dormition Fast, milk during the Nativity Fast, “everyone sets their own rules.” Oikonomia presupposes a norm from which exceptions may be made. Here, the norm itself is nixed.

Scandal in Lviv: Why it is pointless for the UOC to prove its patriotism

Metropolitan Filaret gave Lviv a building for a rehabilitation center for wounded soldiers. Yet “patriots” demanded an explanation as to why a UOC bishop was present at its opening.

How the authorities are trying to destroy UOC abroad

Ukrainian communities across Europe are being accused of espionage and “Russian influence.” The evidence? Holding church services, helping refugees, working with children, and singing Ukrainian Christmas carols.

Should the Church be "with the people" or with God?

The authorities do not need patriots – they need the obedient. Why attempts to prove loyalty do not stop the persecution, and how this ended for the Church in the 20th century.

The implications of recognizing Pochaiv Lavra's "affiliation"

DESS has recognized the Pochaiv Lavra as affiliated with the ROC on the grounds that the Lavra belongs to the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. This is a step toward banning the monastery. But it is also a template that will be applied further.