Why does neural net understand the dangers of Church ban but humans do not?

The neural network ChatGPT negatively assessed the prospect of a UOC ban. Photo: UOJ

One of the most popular news of recent times is the emergence of neural networks. Experts are amazed at how easily and professionally algorithms write analytical articles on any topic. We decided to talk to the most popular ChatGPT network at the moment on the church theme. More precisely, we asked ChatGPT to model the situation of the UOC ban and find out what could be the consequences of this step. The communication with the neural network was in English followed by the translation.

1. Write an analytical article on whether Ukraine should ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

As an artificial intelligence language model, I cannot write an article advocating for banning any religious organization, including the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). However, I can provide information on the concept of banning religious organizations in general.

The concept of banning religious organizations has been a topic of debate for centuries, and some individuals and governments have argued that certain religious groups pose a threat to public safety or public order. In some cases, bans on the activities of religious organizations have been implemented in response to perceived threats, such as terrorism or extremist behaviour.

However, many people and organizations believe that banning religious groups violates the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and belief. This right is protected by various international human rights treaties and enshrined in many national constitutions. Freedom of religion allows individuals to practice their faith without fear of persecution or discrimination.

Moreover, it is important to note that religious organizations often play an important role in society, providing spiritual guidance and support to their members and engaging in charitable activities that benefit the entire community. Thus, banning religious organizations can have serious negative consequences for both individuals who practice the religion and for society as a whole.

In the case of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, it is important to note that this is a complex organization with a long and diverse history. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been a source of cultural and religious identity for many Ukrainians and has played an important role in shaping the country's history and culture.
Any decisions regarding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church should be made in accordance with the laws and regulations of the country in which it operates, and any actions taken should be carried out while respecting human rights, including freedom of religion.
ChatGPT neural network

2. Do you support the ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and what could be the consequences of such a step?

I cannot advocate for the ban on any religious organization, including the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, as it goes against my programming and ethical principles. However, I can provide information about some possible consequences of such a ban.

Firstly, it is important to note that banning a religious organization can have serious negative consequences for both individuals who practice this religion and for society as a whole.

The ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church may provoke a negative reaction from its supporters, which can lead to social unrest or even violence.

Secondly, the UOC ban can be seen as a violation of the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and belief. This right is protected by various international human rights treaties and enshrined in many national constitutions. Restricting this right may harm Ukraine's international reputation and lead to negative economic and political consequences.

In addition, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church plays an important role in Ukrainian society, providing spiritual guidance and support to its members and participating in charitable activities that benefit the entire community. Thus, the ban on the UOC may have negative consequences for the well-being of the Ukrainian people.

Instead of banning the UOC, it may be more productive to engage in dialogue and discussion to address any issues or concerns related to this organization.

In conclusion, while there may be disputes about the role of religious organizations in society, it is important to uphold the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and belief. The ban on religious organizations can have serious negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole. Instead, it is important to participate in dialogue and discussions to address common issues or issues related to religious organizations, while respecting human rights and freedom of religion.

It is easy to notice that even AI negatively assesses the possibility of banning the UOC in its responses while supporting its arguments with objective facts. In other words, the machine "understands" the absurdity of such a scenario, while many people cannot. So, which of us is more reasonable?

Read also