Court orders UOC Synod to refute words calling Drabinko’s actions “shameful”
Alexander Drabinko. Photo: Drabinko's Instagram
The Kyiv Metropolia of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) has been ordered to retract statements describing the actions of Alexander (Drabinko) as "shameful," which were published in the official “Open Appeal of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church to the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko” on November 14, 2016. The appeal had criticized the actions of the prosecutor’s office in investigating the final years of Metropolitan Volodymyr (Sabodan). Drabinko himself published the court documents on Facebook.
The appeal included the following passage:
“It is disheartening to witness the public, low-grade speculations regarding his physical condition in the final years of his life, the distortion of his vision for the future of the Church and Ukraine, expressed in his prayers, and the attempts to push personal ambitions under the guise of the late Primate’s last will.
What adds shame to the situation is the fact that the source of this smear campaign is Metropolitan Alexander (Drabinko) of Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi and Vyshneve. Without informing the Church authorities of any significant facts he may have known, he chose to spread unsubstantiated gossip and slander through the media. Seeking to avoid legal accountability for well-founded suspicions of complicity in a high-profile crime, this bishop deliberately became a tool of political struggle, disregarding morality and discrediting the ministry of the late Primate.”
The court ruled that the following statements from the appeal were “negative, false, and defamatory toward the honor, dignity, and business reputation” of Drabinko:
- “What adds shame to the situation is the fact that the source of this smear campaign is Metropolitan Alexander (Drabinko) of Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi and Vyshneve”;
- “Without informing the Church authorities of any significant facts he may have known, he chose to spread unsubstantiated gossip and slander through the media”;
- “… regarding unfounded suspicions of complicity in a high-profile crime…”
According to the court ruling, the Kyiv Metropolia of the UOC is required to publish the operative part of the decision on the official website of the Synodal Information and Education Department within one month after the ruling takes legal effect. Church institutions are prohibited from editing the text or adding commentary.
The court also ordered the Kyiv Metropolia to reimburse Drabinko for court costs in the amount of 33,931.20 UAH.
The decision may be appealed within 30 days. Until the appeal deadline passes or a potential appeal is resolved, the ruling does not come into force.
Earlier, the UOJ reported that Drabinko justified his transition to the OCU by referring to his formation under Metropolitan Volodymyr.
Read also
Shell hits UOC church in Kherson, rector’s wife injured
As a result of shelling, a side chapel was destroyed and the church dome was damaged at the Church of the Nativity of the Most Holy Theotokos in Kherson. There are also injured.
OCU accuses UOC-KP members of “crimes against canonical order”
The leadership of the OCU has asserted its exclusive right to the Kyiv Patriarchate brand and threatened punishment against Nikodym Kobzar and his associates.
Moldovan bishop tells UN of pressure on the Church
Speaking at the UN, Archbishop Markell said the authorities are putting pressure on the Orthodox Church of Moldova and threatening the seizure of churches.
UOC clergy deliver aid to frontline monasteries and parishes
Clergy of the Kyiv Eparchy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church delivered aid to frontline monasteries and parishes that provide daily support to refugees and the needy.
Vinnytsia region bans religious processions and pilgrimages until December
Vinnytsia’s Defense Council has imposed strict restrictions on believers ahead of the Easter holidays.
Nicaraguan authorities release 1,200 prisoners for Holy Week
In Nicaragua, more than a thousand inmates were released from prison during Holy Week and sent home under a “family cohabitation” regime, with an appeal to begin a “new life.”