SBU finds no prohibited symbols in UOC cross procession to Pochaiv

An MP from the European Solidarity Volodymyr Aryev on his Facebook page said that the SBU did not find any provocative materials during the UOC cross procession from Kamyanets-Podilskyi to the Pochaiv Lavra.  

The SBU responded to his statement that "no items, symbols or provocative materials prohibited for circulation were found" and no facts of activity in support of Russia were established.

"No activities in support of the aggressor, no provocative materials (a portrait of the Russian Tsar Nicholas II) have been found in the Moscow Patriarchate's "procession". All is well. With respect, your SBU. This is how we live...,", says the deputy’s message.

As earlier reported, the cross procession to Pochaiv has passed, but the "patriots" are still waving their fists.

Read also

Sand for construction of Yermak’s residence brought from cemetery, MP says

MP Yaroslav Zhelezniak said that sand illegally removed from a cemetery in Ukrainka was used in the construction of the elite Dynasty cooperative in Kozyn.

Italian court recognizes family with three parents as legal

In Bari, the appellate court ordered authorities to register an adoption according to which a child is listed as having two "fathers" and one mother.

Archaeologists discover biblical Bethsaida on shore of Sea of Galilee

Researchers have discovered a first-century residential house beneath the apse of a Byzantine church and a mosaic inscription mentioning the Apostle Peter.

Israeli soldiers receive jail terms for mocking statue of the Virgin Mary

Those involved in the act of sacrilege in the village of Debel will spend several weeks behind bars for desecrating a statue of the Mother of God.

Serbian Church officially receives back land of 15th-century monastery

An agreement was signed in Belgrade transferring the territory of the ancient Vojlovica Monastery to the Banat Eparchy.

Pat Daniel comments on conflict between Phanar bishop and community in Turkey

The Bulgarian Primate believes that the hierarch of the Constantinople Patriarchate should not have forced the Bulgarian community in Edirne to serve in Greek.