Court keeps UOJ journalist in pre-trial detention
Court hearing. Photo: UOJ
On April 9, 2024, a court hearing took place regarding the appeal against the preventive measure for detained UOJ journalist Andriy Ovcharenko.
According to video materials available to the UOJ, contrary to Ukrainian legislation, Andriy Ovcharenko was not brought to the courtroom.
His lawyer, arguing for a change in the preventive measure, told the court that the materials of the accusation do not contain arguments indicating Ovcharenko's violation of Ukrainian legislation.
As an example, he cited a situation where unknown individuals in Boyarka seized a church belonging to the UOC community, having previously sawed off the locks.
Information about this illegal act appeared on the UOJ website, which the prosecution, referring to the findings of the expertise, considered incitement of religious enmity.
The lawyer drew the court's attention to the fact that Andriy Ovcharenko, like every citizen of Ukraine, has the right to freedom of speech and religion.
A standard television set was installed in the courtroom without additional equipment to enhance sound. As a result, when Andriy Ovcharenko connected, almost nothing he said was audible in the courtroom.
Furthermore, Andriy himself, as the defendant, had no opportunity to participate in the court hearing, respond to the accusations, request the court for explanations, which is a violation of current legislation.
In turn, after Ovcharenko's speech, which was hardly audible due to poor sound quality, the prosecution presented arguments that, in its opinion, proved the guilt of the Orthodox journalist.
As a result of the appellate hearing, the court's decision was to keep the UOJ journalist in pre-trial detention.
Earlier, the UOJ reported that the court rejected the appeal to change the preventive measure for the UOJ journalist.
Read also
OCU raider overseeing church seizures awarded for "spiritual contribution"
Hryshchuk was named the winner of the Ohienko Prize in the category of “Socio-Political and Spiritual Activity.”
“Trump’s confessor”: Reports of church persecution in Ukraine are “fake”
Pastor Mark Burns stated that he met with religious leaders in Ukraine, and none of them mentioned any persecution.
Expert on raids: Violence against UOC undermines Ukraine’s national security
The Belarusian human rights defender believes that if the state cannot protect citizens from gang violence, it ceases to exist.
OCU cleric’s residence searched over fraud involving vehicles for AFU
Haiduk participated in a scheme to sell “humanitarian” vehicles meant for the front lines.
Met Agapit tonsures priest into Great Schema in Otchenashivka church
A hierarch of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church tonsured an archpriest into the Great Schema.
KDAiS professor: Faith in the One Church is not a myth, but a reality
According to Bortnyk, UOC believers “feel a threat to their Orthodox Christian identity, which they have defended for a significant part of their lives.”