Why Uniates go cap in hand to Taras Shevchenko
Head of the UGCC in Kanev
Why do Uniates pay homage to the man who believed Uniatism the biggest evil for Ukraine and never kept this truth back?
An event program:
11.20 - Meeting of guests (the Church of the Intercession of the Virgin, the western foot of Taras Mountain);
12.00 - Hierarchical Divine Liturgy;
13.30 - Solemn procession to Taras Hill;
13.50 - Ceremony of laying flowers at the grave of Taras Shevchenko;
14.00 - A requiem for the repose of the soul of Taras Shevchenko and all those who fell for freedom of Ukraine (on the grave of Taras Shevchenko);
14.30 - Examination of the exhibit of Taras Shevchenko museum.
Press Service of the Kiev Archdiocese
As we can see, the event is very solemn and lasting. Ukrainian Greek Catholics will pray for the repose of the soul of T. Shevchenko and show him their special respect. There is only one question in this respect: will not the Great Kobzar turn over in his coffin from such a prayer?
There are different points of view as for the religious worldview of T. Shevchenko, but one thing is certain: he considered Uniatism a great evil and spoke about this very frankly.
”When we were Cossacks
And there was no union at all,
We used to enjoy our life!
...Until by the name of Christ
Catholic priests came and burnt
Our quiet paradise. And poured
Extensive sea of tears and blood,
And orphans by the name of Christ
Were murdered and crucified.
Cossacks are crestfallen
With their heads bent
like trodden grass.
Ukraine is crying and groaning!
Its people are falling dead beneath.
Torturers are ferocious,
And Catholic priests are crying out madly
“Te deum! Hallelujah!”
(Orsk fortress — 1850, Orenburg)
Another fragment shows how Taras Shevchenko spoke about the Pope, actual leader of the UGCC:
”Around us is falsehood and captivity,
The tormented folks keep silent,
While the Holy See
Is occupied by the well-fed Catholic monk…
Who is shedding people’s blood
And letting Paradise on lease…”
(Heretic, 1845)
Professor Ivan Ogienko writes in his book "The Religiosity of Taras Shevchenko": "When Shevchenko remembers old times and tells how Ukraine was oppressed by Poles, Catholics and Uniates, he loses composure and the most serious accusations break out of his mouth." And he makes a very categorical conclusion: "In our literature there are no such cruel and fiery speeches against the Pope, the Poles, Catholics and Uniates, as Taras Shevchenko made."
Why, then, these same Uniates headed by Sviatoslav Shevchuk go to such a harsh exposer of Uniates like Taras Shevchenko to bow and praise him in every possible way. And the rector of the Uniate church of St. Nicholas on Askold's grave, priest Igor Onishkevich, in 2008, said that his parishioners in prayers turned to Taras Shevchenko as a saint. This was reported by the Kiev newspaper Khreshchatyk.
All is explained simply: the end justifies the means. since T.Shevchenko is now in the trend, since he is considered the most outstanding son of the Ukrainian people, why not hype on the dates of his birth and death (respectively, 9th and 10th of March). After all, to honor the Great Kobzar is very fashionable and patriotic. So is it worth losing the opportunity to collect additional image points because of such a trifle as the opinion of T.Shevchenko himself about the Uniates? So Sviatoslav Shevchuk went to Kanev to the Chernecha Mountain and in a jaunty voice told about how outstanding Shevchenko was and how correctly Greek Catholics do. Is it hypocrisy or Sviatoslav Shevchuk did not read Shevchenko's verses?
But here's another misfortune. The reverence of T. Shevchenko on a national scale was initiated by none other than Vladimir Lenin. In the framework of the Leninist program of monumental propaganda, which was recognized as the most important propaganda tool for the revolution and communist ideology, on April 12, 1918, the Decree of the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR was signed "On the Monuments of the Republic" (Shevchenko is 16th on the list – Ed.)
According to this decision, two monuments of Shevchenko were established in Kiev and one each in Moscow and Leningrad. And in 1919 by the decision of the Soviet authorities Bibikovsky Boulevard was renamed into the boulevard of Taras Shevchenko. Another wave of veneration of Kobzar took place under Stalin’s rule in 1939. Then the name of Shevchenko was awarded to the University of Kiev and the park in front of it. And at Shevchenko's grave in Kanev, in the same year of 1939, a museum and a memorial complex was built together with a monument to which Sviatoslav Shevchuk went to worship.
As we see, neither de-communization nor what Shevchenko himself considered Uniatism to be the greatest evil for Ukraine and its people does not stop the Uniates. They turn a blind eye on this, because they need to reach out to the hearts of ordinary Ukrainians who must believe that they – Uniates – are the most kind and patriotic. However, Shevchenko thought otherwise.
Read also
"Spiritual strength" built on blood: The truth about the Ukrainian Pantheon
The Ukrainian authorities are creating what they call a “place of spiritual strength for the nation.” But can genuine spirituality be built upon the cult of figures associated with Nazism, pogroms, and internecine violence?
UOC-KP after Filaret: Church, brand or refuge for marginals?
The Kyiv Patriarchate shows signs of active life: it accepts overseas parishes and hands out "ordinations." What is this: revival or legitimization of individuals with a troubled past?
Feofania anniversary: Four bishops on the Council, pressure, and unity of UOC
As the anniversary of the Council in Feofania approaches, rumors about impending changes in the UOC have resurfaced. Here is what the hierarchs who participated in those events themselves say.
Vyshyvanka instead of Heaven: When national symbolism overshadows Ascension
The head of the OCU placed the Ascension of the Lord and Vyshyvanka Day on the same level, called the embroidered shirt “sacred,” and asked Christ for help in war. We examine what is wrong with this rhetoric.
Enthronement of Patriarch Shio: neither pro-Moscow nor pro-Phanar but Georgian
Constantinople representatives did not come to the enthronement, but developed vigorous activity the following week. What lies behind this and what to expect from the new Georgian Primate.
Reservation via renunciation: How UOC clergy are being driven into a trap
The authorities are offering UOC clergy a stark ultimatum: acknowledge yourselves as the “Moscow Patriarchate” and receive exemption from mobilization – or refuse, and the draft offices will come for you. Here is why this is a trap.