Lawlessness with Kokhanovska: There's no law in power and never will for UOC
The police abducted and took away the human rights activist V. Kokhanovska. Photo: UOJ
On the evening of April 19, 2023, near the entrance to the Lower Lavra, certain people attacked human rights activist Viktoria Kokhanovska, pushed her into a police car and took her away. And the word "attacked" is not an exaggeration at all. The footage shows Kokhanovska lying on the ground unconscious, although a few seconds ago she was fine and broadcasting live on Facebook.
It is not known what the law enforcement officers did to her. But people don't collapse just like that. This is what the kidnappers themselves said in the car: “She f*ck her (Kokhanovska – Ed.) began fighting back, so I pulled her. She pretended to have fainted away there. I pushed her into the f*cking car, and we’re on our way.”
However, how could this happen at all? How in a democratic country can policemen suddenly attack a woman like this, drag her unconscious on the asphalt and, in fact, kidnap her? Is Kokhanovska a criminal dangerous to society, who can be detained only by brute force? Not at all.
Viktoria Kokhanovska has been protecting the Church for a long time, but she always adheres to the law. She has never refused responsibility for her actions. But, again, according to the law. She was already summoned for questioning on April 10. As long as it was in line with the law, Kokhanovska herself got into the car and drove to the SBU. But when it was illegal, Kokhanovska read aloud the rules of the law to the law enforcement officers. What happened this time?
On the morning of April 19, employees of the Ministry of Culture illegally sealed one of the buildings of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, blocking the monastery's brethren and parishioners inside. Why is it illegal?
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has had an indefinite lease agreement for the premises of the Kyiv Caves Lavra since 2013. Now the authorities have suddenly decided to terminate it and expel the Church. The monastery filed a lawsuit, the trial is slated for April 26. That is, before the trial, the Ministry of Culture did not have the right to close or seal anything. And even more so – to lock people inside. That is why a group of believers, including Kokhanovska, unblocked the building. Now the authorities are accusing these people of hooliganism, and the police have already informed them of suspicion.
Lavra's lawyer Nikita Chekman said that the norm of Article 208 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine was allegedly applied to Kokhanovska, whereby a criminal can be detained with the use of force.
By law, this happens if:
- The offender is detained at the scene of the crime,
- If there are witnesses or signs that this person is a criminal.
But even in this case, the law enforcement officer must inform the detainee of the grounds for detention, of what crime he or she is suspected of committing, and also explain his or her rights: to have a lawyer, receive medical assistance, and so on.
Have we seen something similar in the case of Kochanovska? No. We saw a bandit assault by a group of men on a defenseless woman, because of which she lost consciousness. What does it mean?
It only means that the government could not detain Kokhanovska according to the law – there were no reasons for this. If there were, Viktoria herself would calmly get into the car, as she did before.
There is only one explanation for everything that occurred on the evening of April 19 – the believers were shown that there is no law for them in the country today. Rather, there is the law of force, the law of the whip. Just like it was with Chekists 100 years ago.
Well, all the talk of our government, as if Ukraine is a state of law, seems more and more like a funny joke. But in our case, this joke is sad.
Read also
"Spiritual strength" built on blood: The truth about the Ukrainian Pantheon
The Ukrainian authorities are creating what they call a “place of spiritual strength for the nation.” But can genuine spirituality be built upon the cult of figures associated with Nazism, pogroms, and internecine violence?
UOC-KP after Filaret: Church, brand or refuge for marginals?
The Kyiv Patriarchate shows signs of active life: it accepts overseas parishes and hands out "ordinations." What is this: revival or legitimization of individuals with a troubled past?
Feofania anniversary: Four bishops on the Council, pressure, and unity of UOC
As the anniversary of the Council in Feofania approaches, rumors about impending changes in the UOC have resurfaced. Here is what the hierarchs who participated in those events themselves say.
Vyshyvanka instead of Heaven: When national symbolism overshadows Ascension
The head of the OCU placed the Ascension of the Lord and Vyshyvanka Day on the same level, called the embroidered shirt “sacred,” and asked Christ for help in war. We examine what is wrong with this rhetoric.
Enthronement of Patriarch Shio: neither pro-Moscow nor pro-Phanar but Georgian
Constantinople representatives did not come to the enthronement, but developed vigorous activity the following week. What lies behind this and what to expect from the new Georgian Primate.
Reservation via renunciation: How UOC clergy are being driven into a trap
The authorities are offering UOC clergy a stark ultimatum: acknowledge yourselves as the “Moscow Patriarchate” and receive exemption from mobilization – or refuse, and the draft offices will come for you. Here is why this is a trap.